Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A hearing is mentioned where the court should consider the views of the victims before deciding on a motion to dismiss.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| victims | person | 179 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript or filing where the speaker argues that a court must independently evaluate a government's motion to dismiss and is required to consider the victims' views before making a decision. The speaker cites the case of United States v. Heaton and the expert opinion of former Judge Paul G. Cassell, who concluded that the Crime Victims' Rights Act gives victims broad rights in such matters. The speaker expresses full agreement with this viewpoint, despite some factual differences between the current case and the Heaton case.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Meeting with victims
2008-09-19 • Unknown (implied travel 'going Friday')
Obstruction of justice efforts including calling victims and offering bribes.
Date unknown • Unknown
Planned travel to West Palm Beach for victim interviews regarding Epstein investigation.
2019-05-28 • West Palm Beach, Florida
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Acosta's decision to defer victim notification to state authorities concerning Epstein's state plea hearing and sentencing.
Date unknown • N/A
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
A Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office's interactions with victims during that investigation.
2006-01-01 • Southern District of Florida
A court proceeding where victims and their counsel were permitted to be heard.
2019-09-03 • court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event