Event Details
November 15, 2019
Description
Original deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
027.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2019, requesting a two-week extension for the Defendants (Executors of Epstein's Estate and related entities) to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter notes that Plaintiff's counsel refused to consent to the extension.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely via videoconferencing. Audio access is provided for co-counsel, press, and the public via phone with an access code.
2020-09-10 • Remote (videoconference)
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
One or both of the defendants in the indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts.
2019-08-10
A trial during which Conrad projected an image of being 'always head down, taking notes'.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event