December 18, 2007
Effective date (nunc pro tunc) of respondent's suspension from the practice of law and denial of cross motion for reinstatement.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad (Respondent) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010125.jpg
This document is a printout from a legal database (Thomson Reuters) containing the conclusion of a New York Appellate Division court opinion ('In re Conrad'). It outlines the suspension of a respondent (Conrad) from the practice of law in New York for an indefinite period, effective retroactively to December 18, 2007. The court denied a cross-motion for reinstatement, requiring an expert's evaluation of fitness for any future motion. The document bears a Department of Justice stamp (DOJ-OGR-00010125).
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.
Date unknown
An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event