Event Details
January 01, 1789
Description
Passage of the Judiciary Act of 1789
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Members of US Congress | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021806.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (dated Sept 17, 2024) discussing the legal validity and scope of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It argues that the USAO-SDNY was not notified of, nor did it approve, the NPA created by the USAO-SDFL, and cites the Judiciary Act of 1789 to argue that one US Attorney's actions in a specific district do not bind other districts or the nation. It also notes that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division confirmed to the Office of Professional Responsibility that she had no role in the NPA.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A series of congressional visits to China by approximately eighty members of Congress, which became the most active channel of high-level communication.
1972-01-01 • China
Passage of the 9/11 Saudi bill (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act)
2016-01-01 • USA
FHFA Report to the Congress
2009-01-01 • Washington D.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event