Unknown
Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge McMahon | person | 29 | View Entity |
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00004802.jpg
This page is from a legal ruling in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The court rejects arguments for suppression under 'Franks,' ruling that even if the Government failed to disclose a 2016 meeting with the law firm BSF to Judge McMahon, she would still have granted the modification of the protective order due to 'extraordinary circumstances' and 'significant public interest.' The text establishes that protective orders do not guarantee immunity from criminal subpoenas.
Events with shared participants
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.
2021-10-11 • FedEx
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.
2021-03-31
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Southern District of Florida court denied Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials.
2025-07-23 • Southern District of Florida
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event