Event Details

This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.

This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

This document is a court filing dated April 28, 2020, submitted by attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Paul Gardephe in the Teresa Helm case. It encloses a newly issued Opinion & Order by Judge Paul Engelmayer in a separate case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which grants the Estate's motion to dismiss claims for punitive damages. The court ruled that under New York law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)) and likely US Virgin Islands common law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor because they serve a penal rather than remedial purpose.

This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 342) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 13, 2021. The defense argues for 'individual voir dire' during jury selection, citing the 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein since Epstein's arrest in July 2019 and death in August 2019. The text references Supreme Court precedent regarding the necessity of questioning jurors individually to avoid bias in high-profile cases.

This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has been subjected to intense media harassment and threats following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death. It includes a graph showing a spike in media mentions between 2015 and 2020, specifically highlighting the Miami Herald 'Perversion of Justice' series, Epstein's arrest/death, and a bounty offered by The Sun. The text details abusive social media messages received by Maxwell, citing terms like 'pedophile' and 'pimp,' while noting she was not charged in the original Epstein indictment.