Date Unknown
The defendant seeks to dismiss the Indictment against her based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 NPA.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002964.jpg
This legal document is an argument by the prosecution against a defendant's motion to dismiss an indictment. The prosecution contends that a 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant to the current case. The key reasons are that the defendant was not a party to the NPA, the agreement is not binding on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (where the case is being tried), and the NPA does not provide immunity for the specific crimes with which the defendant is charged.
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.
Date unknown
A hearing was held where the Court provided reasons for its determination, which are stated to still apply.
2020-07-14
The defendant transferred approximately $500,000 from a Swiss Bank account to her Trust Account.
2019-01-01
The Government filed a memorandum (Doc. 100, Exhibit F) in support of the Defendant's Renewed Motion for Release in Case 21-58.
2021-04-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event