Event Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named 'Kate'. She testifies that she worked as a musician and model, and that Epstein initiated sexual activity with her starting at age 17 and continuing into her early thirties. She states this occurred 'every time' they were together, including sexualized massages in London, Palm Beach, and on his island.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by attorney Mr. Everdell. Visoski testifies about a renovation in the mid-90s and confirms he flew on numerous flights with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, interacting with them regularly throughout the 1990s and 2000s. The questioning is pivoting to Visoski's perception of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell.

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Prosecutor Ms. Comey is examining a witness named Carolyn regarding her prior testimony from December 2009. Carolyn confirms that while she cannot recall specific dates of her visits to Epstein's home, she remembers the events clearly, and states that Epstein did not contact her directly, but rather had 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her.

This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies between the witness's current memory and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding who called her about 'Incubus tickets' (Sarah or Epstein). The questioning also establishes that Sarah called the witness to convey that Epstein wanted to take photographs of her.

This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense (Ms. Menninger) attempts to introduce an August 2019 email from the witness to a New York Times reporter to impeach the witness's memory regarding the date of a 2007 meeting with the FBI. The defense argues this reflects on her ability to recall events from 1996, but the prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects on grounds of collateral matter/extrinsic evidence, and the Court sustains the objection.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Visoski is questioned by Ms. Comey about a 'female singer' identified on a document, whom the court refers to by the pseudonym 'Jane.' Visoski confirms this person was a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and recalls meeting her in the mid-to-late 1990s.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski. The testimony confirms that Visoski worked as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein for nearly 30 years (1991-2019), initially as co-captain under his friend David Rogers, before swapping roles to become chief pilot around 2000. The page concludes with attorney Mr. Everdell requesting to display Government's Exhibit 311.

This page contains a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness about her previous deposition testimony given in 2009 related to a civil lawsuit she filed against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are momentarily interrupted to adjust the display size of an exhibit (3505-043) for the court.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mrs. Hesse by Ms. Moe. The testimony concerns a message left by a person named Carolyn on March 11, 2003, and involves the introduction of Government Exhibit 3E after a correction from Exhibit 4B.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Besselsen by Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony discusses a document (likely a letter) regarding 'Jeffrey's personal inventory' (linens, etc.) stored at a facility on the Interlochen campus. The witness confirms that the 'Epstein Scholarship Lodge' is also known as 'Green Lake Lodge'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues for the admission of property records showing a specific property was owned by the 'O'Neills' until 1997, not Maxwell, to impeach testimony from a witness named Kate. The Judge counters that ownership does not equate to residence, noting testimony that Maxwell lived there starting in 1992 regardless of ownership status.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by suggesting she has an incentive to lie and questioning her about schizophrenia, substance abuse, and fears of losing custody of her children—allegations the witness denies. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects to the line of questioning regarding incentives.

This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense establishes that Farmer had no communication with Maxwell after a trip to New Mexico, but admits to accepting money from Jeffrey Epstein for a subsequent trip to Thailand. The witness also acknowledges making public statements in documentaries and podcasts under her real name.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, who admits to initiating email contact with Jeffrey Epstein to arrange a meeting and asking to stay at his residence in New York. Ms. Pomerantz objects to several lines of questioning during the proceedings.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) covering the redirect examination of a witness named Carolyn. During this segment, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca finishes his questioning regarding a photo exhibit (C10), after which prosecutor Ms. Comey questions Carolyn about the authorship of her civil complaint and her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, to which Carolyn admits she did not write them herself. The page concludes with a question regarding an FBI interview report.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on whether Farmer disclosed to the government that she continued to wear boots purchased for her by Jeffrey Epstein for dancing ('two-stepping') after 2006, causing wear and tear. Menninger notes a potential legal issue regarding evidence disclosure (Rule 16) based on the witness's answers.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to the Judge that a photograph of a witness's house was not disclosed earlier because it was intended solely as impeachment material to contradict the witness's testimony, rather than evidence for the case-in-chief. The Judge and Mr. Everdell discuss Rule 16 discovery obligations, with the Judge noting that prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach likely agrees with the procedural distinction.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The testimony reviews Carolyn's prior statements from December 2009 regarding her visits to Jeffrey Epstein's home. Specifically, Carolyn confirms that Epstein did not contact her personally; rather, he would have 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her to arrange the visits.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz discuss the admissibility and origin of two exhibits: a visa application bearing the name 'Kate' (Exhibit K-9) and emails between a witness and Mr. Epstein (Exhibit K-7). Ms. Pomerantz clarifies that the visa form was provided by the witness's counsel during a previous meeting to discuss visa status.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness testifies regarding statements made to the FBI, specifically asserting that either Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell was responsible for canceling an individual named Maria's trip at the last minute. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections regarding hearsay and foundation, which are overruled by the Court.

This page is a transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The questioning focuses on 'Exhibit 52,' a book containing names and arrows; the defense establishes that Alessi did not add the arrows and lacks personal knowledge regarding the document's creation, chain of custody over the last 19 years, or potential alteration (photocopying/reassembling) originating from Palm Beach. Ms. Comey objects to the final question regarding the hypothetical manipulation of the book.

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about inconsistencies regarding whether she felt an 'erect penis' against her back during an encounter with a male subject (implied to be Epstein) and references a May 2020 government interview. The testimony also touches on conversations Farmer had with her mother about being 'not raped' after returning from trips to New Mexico and Thailand.

This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on technical forensic details, specifically regarding computer clones, passwords, metadata, and the creation date of a specific Word document (Government Exhibit 418) which was established as January 29, 2002. The witness confirms they did not verify the physical location of any person on that specific date based on the metadata.