Event Details
Future (relative to doc)
Description
Hearing regarding requested discovery
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00008964.jpg
This document is page 2 of a Government filing from February 16, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Government argues against the defendant's requests to redact specific information from a briefing, including arguments about the jury pool composition (specifically regarding sexual abuse survivors), investigative steps taken by the defense, the defense's view of underlying facts, and discovery requests. The Government asserts these redactions are not authorized by the Court's previous orders or are not narrowly tailored.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event