Event Details
November 16, 2021
Description
Oral voir dire was conducted, during which Juror 50 confirmed his ability to be impartial.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | person | 685 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009835.jpg
This legal document is a court filing that refutes the defendant's argument that the court failed to properly question Juror 50 about potential biases. The filing asserts that Juror 50 repeatedly confirmed his ability to be impartial and decide the case based on the evidence, and that the court's voir dire process was correct in not delving into specific defense theories, citing legal precedent about the purpose of jury selection.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status
2021-11-04 • N/A
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post
2022-01-01 • Twitter
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.
Date unknown • The Court
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event