Event Details
Unknown (Post-Indictment)
Description
Evidentiary hearing regarding the scope of the plea agreement.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecutor | person | 8 | View Entity |
| defense attorney | person | 14 | View Entity |
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021837.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated November 1, 2024. It analyzes the legal precedent of *Annabi* (771 F.2d 671), focusing on whether a plea agreement made with the US Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) prevents prosecution by the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The text highlights the Second Circuit's ruling that despite being counterintuitive, an agreement to dismiss counts by one district's prosecutor did not bind the United States from prosecuting in another district. This legal argument is likely being cited in the broader context of the Epstein case to discuss the validity and scope of Non-Prosecution Agreements across different federal districts.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.
2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.
2020-09-02 • SDNY
District court's opinion in the CVRA litigation
2019-01-01
District court issued an opinion concluding that the government violated the CVRA by failing to consult with victims before entering the NPA.
2019-02-21
The District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell was issued.
2022-06-29 • District Court
The District Court denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony.
Date unknown • District Court
The Second Circuit issued a writ of mandamus in 'In re U.S.', reversing a District Court's order that directed the Government to produce oral statements from defendants and coconspirators.
1987-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event