Event Details
During jury deliberations
Description
Jury sent a note asking if aiding in the return flight but not the flight to New Mexico constitutes guilt under Count Four.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021813.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, related to the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It discusses the District Court's refusal to grant a new trial and specifically addresses a jury note sent during deliberations regarding Count Four and the transportation of a victim named 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. Footnotes address a hearing regarding Juror 50's potential misconduct and citations to the court record.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
The continuation of a trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event