Event Details
March 24, 2021
Description
Filing date of this document.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte | person | 34 | View Entity |
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (4)
DOJ-OGR-00002833.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 859) dated March 24, 2021, from a criminal case involving a defendant named Schulte (likely Joshua Schulte, though found in a DOJ release). The text outlines the court's rejection of the defendant's arguments regarding venue impropriety, affirming that it is constitutional to indict in one courthouse (White Plains) and try in another (Manhattan) within the same district. The court cites the COVID-19 pandemic delays in Summer 2020 as further justification for the procedural flexibility.
DOJ-OGR-00001820.jpg
This is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated November 6, 2020. The Government argues against the immediate production of witness lists (Giglio/Jencks material), stating it is premature seven months before trial. The document details an upcoming 'sixth discovery production' due November 9, 2020, which includes thousands of images/videos from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices, portions of his iPads and iPhone, and FBI Florida files.
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
This page is from a government legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss. The Government argues that Maxwell's claims of prejudice due to pre-indictment delay and media publicity since 2011 are speculative and insufficient to warrant dismissal. A footnote details a discovery dispute where the defense is requesting names, birth dates of minor victims, and specific details of overt acts.
DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (likely an opinion or order) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). It discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss his indictment regarding the alleged transmission of national defense information to WikiLeaks. Schulte argues that the White Plains grand jury venire violated his constitutional rights by failing to represent a fair cross-section of African American and Hispanic American populations. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the text exclusively concerns Joshua Schulte; however, this document may be part of a larger FOIA production covering SDNY cases or MCC New York issues.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.
2021-10-11 • FedEx
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.
2021-03-31
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Southern District of Florida court denied Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials.
2025-07-23 • Southern District of Florida
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event