Event Details
November 14, 2025
Description
The witness testified in front of a Grand Jury. The questioning focuses on who provided transportation.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Witness's dad | person | 12 | View Entity |
| THE WITNESS | person | 168 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012457.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A meeting was held to discuss a 'lawsuit'. The witness states she spent the night at the location after the meeting.
Date unknown • Witness's aunt's house
The witness listened to a prior statement.
Date unknown • here
A massage session involving the witness and Mr. Epstein. During this event, the witness alleges Mr. Epstein asked her to remove her bra and touched her. The witness denies touching Mr. Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off' (masturbating him).
Date unknown • Not specified
A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their attorney Mr. Leopold present.
Date unknown • Not specified
A past visit by the witness to Epstein's house is referenced in a question.
Date unknown • Epstein's house
An interview was conducted with a witness about their connection to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirmed they knew Epstein and stated they worked for a carpet cleaning company.
2007-04-25 • Unknown
A lawsuit was filed by Jeff Herman on behalf of the witness against Mr. Epstein for fifty million dollars.
Date unknown
A legal deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned about using a racial slur in a written message. A procedural dispute arises between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, regarding the questioning of the witness and the identification of Exhibit 31-001.
Date unknown • Unknown
A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned about the use of a racial slur in a message. The deposition includes procedural arguments between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein regarding the identification and spelling of the word for the record, and the marking of exhibits.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event