You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Event Details

December 28, 2020

Description

Filing of Document 103-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

Participants (5)

Name Type Mentions
The government organization 3113 View Entity
Ms. Maxwell person 1982 View Entity
Defense counsel person 578 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity

Source Documents (5)

DOJ-OGR-00001195.jpg

Legal Filing (Court Memorandum/Motion Reply) • 614 KB
View

This is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's claim that Maxwell is hiding assets to prepare for flight, stating that her transfers to her spouse were disclosed on tax returns and that her asset estimates from jail were accurate given the circumstances. The document details financial specifics, including a London property used for loans and $4 million controlled by her spouse, with specific details regarding the spouse's assets redacted.

DOJ-OGR-00001199.jpg

Legal Filing (Defense Reply Memorandum in Support of Bail) • 664 KB
View

This document is a page from a defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense counters flight risk arguments by noting Maxwell has not lived in the UK or France for 30 years and cites the recent arrest of associate Jean-Luc Brunel in France as a deterrent to fleeing there. Additionally, the filing argues that a COVID-19 surge at the MDC and potential suspension of legal communications threaten Maxwell's health and constitutional rights.

DOJ-OGR-00001189.jpg

Court Filing - Table of Exhibits • 198 KB
View

This document is a Table of Exhibits from a court filing dated June 23, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists two exhibits: Exhibit A, an addendum opinion by Julié regarding France, and Exhibit B, an addendum opinion by Perry regarding the U.K.

DOJ-OGR-00001187.jpg

Legal Filing (Table of Contents) • 449 KB
View

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (likely a reply brief in support of a bail motion) filed on December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government's case is weak (relying on only three witnesses), that Maxwell has substantial ties to the US (including a spouse whose name is redacted), that she has disclosed all finances for bond, and that the COVID surge at the MDC justifies her release. It also refutes the claim that she is a flight risk or that extradition from France or the UK would be refused.

DOJ-OGR-00020114.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Motion (Defense Reply regarding Bail) • 578 KB
View

This document is page 7 of a legal filing filed on December 23, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell and her spouse have pledged all their assets and that her spouse has liquidated investments to support the bond, countering the government's argument that she is a flight risk or 'adept at hiding.' The text also disputes government claims regarding the verification of the spouse's financial information.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.

Date unknown

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.

2021-02-16 • MDC

View

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.

Date unknown • prison/jail

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.

2007-01-01

View

Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.

2016-01-01

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
5
Source Documents
5
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00001195.jpg
Date String
2020-12-28

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event