December 28, 2020
Filing of Document 103-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001195.jpg
This is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's claim that Maxwell is hiding assets to prepare for flight, stating that her transfers to her spouse were disclosed on tax returns and that her asset estimates from jail were accurate given the circumstances. The document details financial specifics, including a London property used for loans and $4 million controlled by her spouse, with specific details regarding the spouse's assets redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00001199.jpg
This document is a page from a defense filing (Reply Memorandum) dated December 28, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense counters flight risk arguments by noting Maxwell has not lived in the UK or France for 30 years and cites the recent arrest of associate Jean-Luc Brunel in France as a deterrent to fleeing there. Additionally, the filing argues that a COVID-19 surge at the MDC and potential suspension of legal communications threaten Maxwell's health and constitutional rights.
DOJ-OGR-00001189.jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits from a court filing dated June 23, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists two exhibits: Exhibit A, an addendum opinion by Julié regarding France, and Exhibit B, an addendum opinion by Perry regarding the U.K.
DOJ-OGR-00001187.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (likely a reply brief in support of a bail motion) filed on December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government's case is weak (relying on only three witnesses), that Maxwell has substantial ties to the US (including a spouse whose name is redacted), that she has disclosed all finances for bond, and that the COVID surge at the MDC justifies her release. It also refutes the claim that she is a flight risk or that extradition from France or the UK would be refused.
DOJ-OGR-00020114.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing filed on December 23, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell and her spouse have pledged all their assets and that her spouse has liquidated investments to support the bond, countering the government's argument that she is a flight risk or 'adept at hiding.' The text also disputes government claims regarding the verification of the spouse's financial information.
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event