Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The jury discussed the case, including why victims returned to Epstein and Maxwell, and ultimately found the victims credible.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| David | person | 88 | View Entity |
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
David graduated with a bachelor's degree in Business Administration.
1984-01-01 • University of Michigan
David started his first job delivering newspapers.
2025-11-11 • Detroit
The jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' of the charges against her, which related specifically to the accuser Jane.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event