January 01, 2010
Opinion issued in the case United States v. Dodge, 597 F.3d 1347, 1355.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge | person | 15 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
This legal document argues that a District Court's interpretation of statute § 3283 is flawed because it relies on misinterpreted legal precedent. The author contends the court, following a Third Circuit opinion, improperly applied a quote from the *Dodge* case, which concerned a different statute (SORNA), to invent a legislative history for § 3283 that does not exist.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event