February 15, 2012
Direct examination of an unnamed witness by Conrad in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
| Unnamed witness | person | 114 | View Entity |
| MR. OKULA | person | 182 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009921.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the direct examination of an unnamed witness by an attorney named Conrad regarding the witness's prior statements in court, where they called a defense motion 'ridiculous' and made comments to Judge Pauley about his background. The witness is largely uncooperative, frequently claiming a lack of recall, leading to a tense exchange about their motives and credibility.
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives.
2017-07-26
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A motion alleged that the witness 'came into court and lied and lied and lied on March 1, 2011.'
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event