Event Details
November 29, 2019
Description
Defendants filed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [DE 36]
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
| Nine East 71st Street Corporation | organization | 116 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
041.pdf
This document is a letter filed on December 9, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff (VE) will not file an amended pleading in response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed in November 2019, but will instead defend the existing First Amended Complaint. The document establishes the legal representation of the plaintiff by Edwards Pottinger LLC in this civil action against an Epstein-related entity.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely via videoconferencing. Audio access is provided for co-counsel, press, and the public via phone with an access code.
2020-09-10 • Remote (videoconference)
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
One or both of the defendants in the indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts.
2019-08-10
A trial during which Conrad projected an image of being 'always head down, taking notes'.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event