Date Unknown
Jane traveled to a state other than New York and engaged in sexual activity.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021139.jpg
This legal document argues that there is a substantial likelihood that the defendant, Maxwell, was convicted on Counts Three and Four based on conduct that was not charged in the indictment, specifically conduct in New Mexico. The filing contends that the jury was not properly instructed that the charged offense required travel from Florida to New York, potentially leading to an improper conviction based on uncharged acts. This would constitute a constructive amendment of the indictment.
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
Jane's first trip to New York, coinciding with The Lion King release.
1997-01-01 • New York
Jane's trip to Europe with her family.
1998-01-01 • Europe
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
An alleged encounter where Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein met the witness. The details of this encounter are being disputed.
Date unknown
Jane was placed on at least one flight with Maxwell, as evidenced by flight logs.
Date unknown
The continuation of a trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event