Event Details
December 23, 2020
Description
Filing of Document 103
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00002215(1).jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 103) from December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that Maxwell and her spouse only discussed divorce prior to her arrest to protect him from 'terrible consequences,' not because the relationship was failing, and asserts that the spouse is willing to co-sign her bond. It also defends Maxwell's financial disclosures, stating she has pledged all her and her spouse's assets and that the government has not successfully challenged the accuracy of her financial report.
DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Document 103) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 23, 2020. The text argues against the government's concerns regarding Maxwell's flight risk, utilizing expert opinions from Mr. Julié (French law) and David Perry (UK law) to assert that extradition from France or the UK would be legally permissible and likely, and that bail in the UK would be denied. It specifically refutes the relevance of a 2006 precedent where France refused extradition, arguing that international treaties prevail over French national legislation.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Deadline/Scheduled date to docket redacted versions of briefings on birth certificates, GX-52, and the Government's motion to quash.
2021-11-22 • Southern District of New York (Court Docket)
In advance of a conference, the government and defense counsel proposed a joint schedule for discovery, motion practice, and a trial.
Date unknown
An ongoing privilege review of electronically stored information is being conducted.
Date unknown
Government filed a letter motion requesting an order of nolle prosequi (dismissal of charges due to death) in U.S. v. Epstein.
2019-08-19 • Southern District of New York
Villafaña attempted to obtain computer equipment that was missing from Epstein's home.
Date unknown • Palm Beach
Cross-examination of a witness named Jane.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event