Event Details

Unknown (Future)

Description

Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Proceeding

Participants (4)

Name Type Mentions
The Court organization 2003 View Entity
victims person 179 View Entity
Ms. Maxwell person 1982 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg

Legal Filing / Letter to Court (Defense Sentencing Submission) • 553 KB
View

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 21, 2022. The defense argues that the sentencing hearing should not be an 'open forum' for alleged victims who were not part of the trial record, specifically naming Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein as individuals who should not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA for this specific case. The letter distinguishes Maxwell's case from the abatement of the Epstein case and requests advance notice of who will be permitted to speak at sentencing.

DOJ-OGR-00010599.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Document • 676 KB
View

This is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 672) from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 24, 2022. The defense argues that the upcoming sentencing proceeding should not be an 'open-mike forum' and contends that individuals who do not strictly qualify as 'crime victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should be barred from giving oral testimony or having their statements read. The filing asserts that allowing non-statutory victims to speak would trample Maxwell's rights and suggests some individuals may be motivated by financial reward or media attention.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.

2021-02-16 • MDC

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.

Date unknown • prison/jail

View

Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail

2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
4
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:44

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg
Date String
Unknown (Future)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event