August 10, 2022
The attorneys agree to confer to narrow the issues regarding prior inconsistent statements.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
| Ms. Sternheim | person | 877 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00016620.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. With the jury not present, the judge excuses a witness for a break and then discusses procedural matters with the attorneys (Pomerantz, Sternheim, Rohrbach, Everdell). The primary focus is on resolving 'prior inconsistent statements,' with the judge urging the lawyers to confer and narrow the points of disagreement.
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Attorneys and the judge discuss the procedure for presenting evidence to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the scope of cross-examination.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event