April 01, 2022
Ruling in the case U.S. v. Pham, No. 12-cr-423, 2022 WL 993119.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan, J. | person | 10 | View Entity |
| Pham | person | 4 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
This legal document argues that a District Court's interpretation of statute § 3283 is flawed because it relies on misinterpreted legal precedent. The author contends the court, following a Third Circuit opinion, improperly applied a quote from the *Dodge* case, which concerned a different statute (SORNA), to invent a legislative history for § 3283 that does not exist.
Events with shared participants
U.S. v. Pham, No. 12-cr-423, 2022 WL 993119 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2022)
2022-04-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event