Event Details

January 01, 2006

Description

A ruling was made in the case of Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, establishing a framework for public access to documents.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Lugosch person 49 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009063.jpg

Unknown type • 711 KB
View

This document is a page from a legal filing, dated February 24, 2022, arguing against the public release of pleadings from 'Juror No. 50'. The argument cites legal precedents, primarily Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, to outline the three-step process for determining public access to judicial documents. The author contends that releasing the documents would be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial and that there is no compelling reason for their release.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Legal case cited: Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).

2006-01-01

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Ruling
Location
Second Circuit
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:35

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009063.jpg
Date String
2006

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event