January 01, 2006
A ruling was made in the case of Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, establishing a framework for public access to documents.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lugosch | person | 49 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009063.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated February 24, 2022, arguing against the public release of pleadings from 'Juror No. 50'. The argument cites legal precedents, primarily Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, to outline the three-step process for determining public access to judicial documents. The author contends that releasing the documents would be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial and that there is no compelling reason for their release.
Events with shared participants
Legal case cited: Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
2006-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event