Event Details
January 01, 2012
Description
Legal proceedings regarding Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sovereign Defendants | organization | 8 | View Entity |
| Plaintiffs | person | 35 | View Entity |
| NCB | organization | 66 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023409.jpg
This document is page 49 of a legal brief or court opinion titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed via Westlaw. It discusses the legal necessity of jurisdictional discovery regarding 'Sovereign Defendants' and 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank), which claims to be an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The text concludes by requesting the reversal of a lower court's dismissal of certain defendants and includes detailed footnotes referencing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the 9/11 Commission Report, and CIA documents concerning Usama Bin Laden and Enaam Arnaout.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling
2005-01-01 • Court
Court Opinion Issued
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765).
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Legal Opinion/Case Proceeding
2012-01-01 • Legal Record
Legal Filing/Opinion
2012-01-01 • Court
Lawsuit filed
2002-09-04 • S.D.N.Y.
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
A civil litigation where multiple plaintiffs sued Jeffrey Epstein.
Date unknown
In a civil litigation, defense counsel declined to accept service on behalf of the defendant, forcing plaintiffs to seek leave of the court.
Date unknown • this district
Civil litigation cases involving the defendant.
Date unknown • Various courts
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event