Event Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the defense summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a key witness's testimony is inconsistent, specifically highlighting that the witness admitted she does not recall Ghislaine Maxwell touching her, giving her massage instructions, or being present during specific sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein, contradicting the government's narrative.

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues that a key witness ('she') has a poor and inconsistent memory, noting the absence of her name in flight logs alongside 'famous people.' Menninger highlights discrepancies between the witness's testimony and her statements in December 2019 and February 2020, where she claimed lack of recollection.

This document is a page from a defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attempts to impeach the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' regarding allegations of sexualized massages involving women named Sophie and Eva. The defense highlights flight records from November 1996 showing Jane traveled with Sophie and Dr. Eva Dubin, noting that Dubin was traveling with her child and nanny, arguing this context makes the sexual allegations improbable.

This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues against the reliability of accuser memories, citing expert Dr. Loftus and discrediting Dr. Rocchio, while asserting that 'money is a powerful manipulator.' The text transitions to discussing the six counts against Maxwell, specifically defining conspiracy as an agreement to violate the law.