January 01, 1997
Ruling in Carnegie v. Tedder
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carnegie | person | 17 | View Entity |
| Tedder | person | 5 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015623.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event