Event Details
February 15, 2012
Description
Hearing with sworn testimony and adverse direct examination by Government attorneys
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government attorneys | person | 5 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010127.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 6, 2012, presents an opinion on the ethical obligations of Brune & Richard lawyers concerning disclosures related to a new trial motion involving juror Conrad. It concludes that the lawyers did not violate their ethical obligations in their research, motions, or communications with the Court. The opinion is based on a review of various legal documents and transcripts, and references the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of Government response letter
2020-08-21 • Southern District of New York
Filing of Document 60 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2020-10-06 • Southern District of New York
Filing date of the document according to the header.
2019-07-12 • Court
Date of the memorandum/letter addressed to Judge Pitman.
2019-07-08 • New York (Implied SDNY)
Filing of Document 11 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
2019-07-12 • United States District Court
Hearing regarding U.S. v. Epstein (referred to as 'Monday's hearing' in the July 13 email).
2019-07-15 • Court (likely SDNY)
Court Conference / Proceeding
2019-08-27 • Southern District of New York (implied)
Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-03-11
Filing of Document 643
2022-03-11 • Court
Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming')
2021-04-23 • SDNY Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event