Event Details
N/A
Description
Legal Argument regarding NPA applicability
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| The government | organization | 3113 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021092.jpg
This document is page 45 of a legal brief filed on February 28, 2023 (Case 22-1426). It argues that the government must adhere to plea bargains and immunity agreements, specifically referencing a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and arguing that 'Count Six' falls within the timeframe of that NPA. It cites case law (Harvey, Annabi) to support the argument that the government is held to a high standard regarding nationwide immunity promises and that new charges must be 'sufficiently distinct' from those covered by a plea.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.
Date unknown
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein.
2007-01-01
Lawyers for accusers met with the Government to convince them to open an investigation of Ms. Maxwell.
2016-01-01
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Victims filed discovery requests with the Government, seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others.
2011-10-11 • Federal court (S.D. Fla.)
Filing of Government's conclusion requesting dismissal of Maxwell's appeal.
2020-09-16 • New York, New York
The Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, with submissions due on December 8, 16, and 18, 2020.
2020-12-07
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event