Event Details
January 01, 2005
Description
Legal Ruling (392 F.Supp.2d 539)
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saudi High Commission (SHC) | organization | 10 | View Entity |
| Plaintiffs | person | 35 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017905.jpg
This document is a page from a 2019 Westlaw printout containing legal headnotes for the 2005 case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal arguments regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically affirming that the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and two Saudi officials were entitled to immunity in a lawsuit alleging they funded terrorism. The text discusses the rejection of a specific article offered as evidence by plaintiffs and establishes the legal standard for sovereign immunity regarding foreign agents.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling
2005-01-01 • Court
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Court Opinion Issued
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765).
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Legal Opinion/Case Proceeding
2012-01-01 • Legal Record
Legal Filing/Opinion
2012-01-01 • Court
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event