Event Details

January 01, 1995

Description

Commonwealth v. Stipetich legal decision regarding police promises.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Pittsburgh Police person 0 View Entity
Stipetich person 9 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg

Court Filing / Legal Brief (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE - United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) • 738 KB
View

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) referencing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It discusses the validity of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs), specifically analyzing why Cosby's claim of immunity based on a District Attorney's promise was rejected by the Superior Court. It also cites *Commonwealth v. Stipetich* to argue that police promises cannot bind a District Attorney's office to non-prosecution agreements.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 19:17

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg
Date String
1995 (approximate for decision)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event