January 01, 1995
Commonwealth v. Stipetich legal decision regarding police promises.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburgh Police | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Stipetich | person | 9 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) referencing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It discusses the validity of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs), specifically analyzing why Cosby's claim of immunity based on a District Attorney's promise was rejected by the Superior Court. It also cites *Commonwealth v. Stipetich* to argue that police promises cannot bind a District Attorney's office to non-prosecution agreements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event