Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

The 'pre voir dire stage' of a legal case, during which the witness's firm received a juror list and questionnaires.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Brune's firm person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009322.jpg

Legal Document • 443 KB
View

This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding preparations for jury selection (voir dire). The questioning focuses on the timeline of receiving information, including a juror list, research from the Nardello firm, and a 2010 suspension opinion concerning Catherine M. Conrad. Brune clarifies that the opinion was discussed on the morning of court in the presence of jury consultant Dennis Donahue, rather than definitively before the start of voir dire.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.

Date unknown

View

The government requested discovery about what the witness's firm knew.

Date unknown

View

The witness's firm filed a brief pertaining to client work product in resistance to a discovery request.

Date unknown

View

An investigation into Juror No. 7 conducted by the witness's (Brune's) firm.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Proceeding Stage
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:28

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009322.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event