November 19, 2021
The Court permitted Kate to testify.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate | person | 631 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009586.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant was not legally prejudiced regarding witness testimony. It outlines that the defense received notes on witness Jane more than three weeks before trial and that the court's decision to permit witness Kate to testify came almost two weeks after notes were received, providing ample time for preparation. The filing cites legal precedents to assert that the court did not err in its handling of limiting instructions and that any failure to request them was the defendant's own, not a basis for a prejudice claim.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
An interview where Kate stated she was ambitious and spent 90 percent of her time thinking about her next career move.
Date unknown
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
A court proceeding involving the direct examination of a witness named Kate.
2022-08-10 • courtroom
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that she owned a house in London.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event