Event Details

December 12, 2000

Description

The court decision in the case of United States v. Namer, cited as precedent regarding flight risk and detention.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Namer person 12 View Entity
United States location 4439 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00020082.jpg

legal document • 747 KB
View

This legal document argues that a defendant's purported waiver of extradition from France and the United Kingdom is unenforceable and does not mitigate her flight risk. It explains that UK law requires an independent judicial review of extradition and that the process is lengthy, uncertain, and subject to appeal, making it an ineffective guarantee. The document cites several court cases as precedent to support the argument that the difficulty of extradition increases flight risk and is a valid consideration for detaining a defendant pending trial.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The United States purchased St. Thomas, St. John, and Saint Croix as a defensive strategy related to the Panama Canal during WWI.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The United States purchased St. Thomas, Saint John, and Saint Croix as part of a defensive strategy during the First World War.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands.

1927-01-01 • U.S. Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands from Denmark.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China.

Date unknown

View

Revision of the US-South Korea trade agreement.

2018-01-01

View

Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US.

2015-01-01

View

United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs.

Date unknown

View

South Korea is excluded from US steel tariffs in exchange for capping its steel exports.

2018-01-01 • N/A

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal proceeding
Location
6th Cir.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00020082.jpg
Date String
2000-12-12

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event