Event Details
August 22, 2022
Description
A discussion during a court proceeding regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically whether the 2003 or 2004 guidelines should apply and who should make that determination.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the Judge | person | 138 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00014766.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and a defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, during a sentencing hearing. The judge summarizes the probation department's sentencing recommendation and invites Mr. Everdell to present his arguments. Mr. Everdell argues that the jury, not the court, should determine which version of the sentencing guidelines (2003 or 2004) applies, citing the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Attorneys and the judge discuss the procedure for presenting evidence to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
Discussion about a witness coming from the U.K. who cannot be present until Monday.
Date unknown
A discussion in court between the judge and Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of testimony and evidence related to property records.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding jury instructions, specifically concerning the interpretation of New Mexico law on illegal sexual activity and how evidence should be presented to the jury. The Court indicates it will consider the points raised and re-propose instructions.
2021-12-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event