Date Unknown
Jury deliberations during which a note was sent to the District Court.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury | person | 126 | View Entity |
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000080.tif
This document outlines legal arguments concerning Maxwell's trial, specifically addressing the District Court's handling of juror selection and a jury note related to Count Four of the Indictment. It discusses whether Maxwell could be found guilty for aiding in Jane's transportation if the intent for sexual activity was not tied to the New Mexico flight, and references a case (United States v. Ianniello) regarding juror questioning.
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The jury's first task is to choose a foreperson.
Date unknown • Jury Room
The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening statements and conclude for the day at 5 p.m.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
The continuation of a trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event