Circa 2008
The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ (Department of Justice) | organization | 432 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
Events with shared participants
DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ensure' regarding government-funded counsel for victims.
Date unknown
DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing conflict of interest concerns and existing procedures under 18 U.S.C. §3509(h).
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22 U.S.C. 7105(b)(2)(B) to allow OJP to better allocate funds for trafficking victims.
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are included with HHS in the development of a $5,000,000 Pilot Program.
Date unknown
Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections.
Date unknown
The Administration's proposal in the 2008 Budget to consolidate DOJ's grant programs.
2008-01-01
The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a proposed bill, specifically Section 214 and its subsections, related to funding and programs for trafficking victims.
Date unknown • United States
DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in persons, including training on juvenile victims through the Innocence Lost National Initiative.
Date unknown • N/A
DOJ training and field training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases.
Date unknown • N/A
The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legislation regarding child trafficking, border security, and the handling of unaccompanied minors (UACs).
Date unknown • Not applicable
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event