August 21, 2020
Filing of Government letter regarding Protective Order dispute.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00019551.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a letter from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, arguing against modifying a protective order. The Government asserts that the defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell) should not be allowed to use materials from criminal discovery in her civil cases, citing witness privacy and an active, ongoing grand jury investigation into co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein. The text emphasizes that defense counsel represents the defendant in both criminal and civil matters and warns against 'cherry-picking' confidential materials to defend against abuse accusations.
Events with shared participants
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewing additional witnesses, reviewing documents, and subpoenaing additional records.
2021-03-31
Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061
2020-10-02 • Court
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Government sent hard drive with 3500 material via FedEx.
2021-10-11 • FedEx
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing
Government completed internal processes to prepare a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) and presented it to the grand jury.
2021-03-31
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event