Event Details
January 01, 2006
Description
The Second Circuit's decision in United States v. Stewart, which framed a test for undisclosed juror bias.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stewart | person | 122 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009113.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 should have been struck for cause due to bias revealed in press statements. It cites legal precedent, primarily the Supreme Court's decision in McDonough and the Second Circuit's test in United States v. Stewart, to assert that a new trial can be granted based on a juror's inaccurate voir dire response, even if the response was not deliberately dishonest. The document contends that the key is whether the juror was actually biased and whether a correct answer would have provided grounds for a challenge.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC, 20 Civ. 885 (SLC), 2020 WL 7239676 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2020)
2020-12-09 • S.D.N.Y.
The case of United States v. Stewart, 317 F. Supp. 2d 432, 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) was decided.
2004-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
The Second Circuit affirmed the decision in United States v. Stewart.
2006-01-01 • Second Circuit
Decision in the case Stewart.
2006-01-01
United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273
2006-01-01 • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
WME Party at Ari Emanuel's estate
2012-02-01 • Brentwood estate
Manhattan bash / Cipriani Wall Street event
2005-03-15 • Cipriani Wall Street, Manhattan
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event