Event Details
June 15, 2010
Description
A ruling was issued in the case SEC v. Boock in the Southern District of New York.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boock | person | 2 | View Entity |
| SEC | organization | 711 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00019434.jpg
This legal document, dated September 24, 2020, argues that the government strategically chose not to intervene to prevent the unsealing of Ms. Maxwell's depositions. The filing suggests this inaction allows the government to later claim any violation of a prior ruling was harmless. It supports its argument by citing legal precedents, such as 'Louis Vuitton' and 'SEC v. Boock', which warn of the dangers for defendants who waive their Fifth Amendment rights during civil discovery.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
SEC Complaint Filing
Date unknown • N/A
SEC decision not to bring charges regarding the resignation/incident.
Date unknown • USA
Target date for NTP (National Transformation Program) objectives.
2020-01-01 • Saudi Arabia
Electricity prices increased by weighted average of close to 20%.
2016-01-01 • Saudi Arabia
Epstein's designation as a sex offender
Date unknown • New York
Internal investigation into Snowden's suspicious computer activities.
2009-02-01 • Washington
Harold Simmons Foundation files with SEC to sell 2.5 million shares.
2014-06-11 • N/A
SEC Investigation (implied)
Date unknown • N/A
Release of House Internal Security Committee blacklist
Date unknown • Washington D.C. / National
Request initiated for certified corporate records from Delaware.
2008-03-05 • Miami / Dover, DE
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event