January 01, 2002
The document argues that Ms. Maxwell was no longer actively participating in the offense conduct by 2002 or 2003 at the latest.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010423.jpg
This legal document is a filing in the case of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that the 2003 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines should apply to her case, not the harsher 2004 Guidelines. The central dispute is the end date of the criminal conduct, with the defense contending it ceased by 2003 at the latest, before the 2004 Guidelines took effect. The document asserts that this factual determination must be made by a jury, not the court, consistent with the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Events with shared participants
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.
2020-10-13
Indictment of Ms. Maxwell.
2020-01-01 • New York
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Ms. Maxwell moved to stay discovery in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke' (No. 19-cv-10475) due to a pending criminal investigation.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
An appeal challenging a protective order's bar on disclosure of information.
Date unknown
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
Case 22-1426, Document 87, filed on 07/27/2023.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell and John talked about the importance of details regarding the household tasks.
2001-05-18
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event