Event Details

This document is a page from a court filing (Document 674) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 24, 2022. It contains a victim impact statement submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Nathan. The statement describes the professional and emotional toll of the trial on the victim, criticizes Maxwell's lack of remorse and refusal to admit guilt, and urges the judge to consider the ongoing suffering of the victims during sentencing.

This document is page 13 of a court filing (Document 672) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley. It contains a victim impact statement (likely from a testifying witness) describing the 'retraumatization' caused by the trial process, cross-examination, and Maxwell's refusal to admit guilt. The author urges Judge Nathan to consider the ongoing suffering of the victims and their families when determining Maxwell's prison sentence.

This document is a court filing (Exhibit) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed on February 24, 2022. It displays a screenshot of Twitter interactions involving Juror No. 50 (Scotty David), journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley, and witness Annie Farmer. The document highlights that Juror No. 50 publicly communicated with a witness (Farmer) on Twitter, stating her testimony was critical to the verdict, and used a Twitter handle matching his name given in press interviews.

This document is a court filing from February 2022 containing screenshots of an Instagram account ('thisbeartravels') belonging to Scotty David (identified as Juror No. 50). The posts reveal David publicly discussing his role as a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and mentioning his use of therapy to deal with the stress of the case. The filing notes that Juror No. 50 deleted his social media accounts (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn) shortly after these posts were discovered.

This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated February 28, 2023, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Everdell are arguing before the Judge that a specific juror (referred to as 'he') demonstrated bias and dishonesty by publicly discussing his own history of sexual abuse and his role in the trial on Facebook and to victim Annie Farmer, despite claiming during selection he didn't want to share that history. The Court agrees to ask the juror to reconcile his claim of privacy with his public media engagement.

This document is a court filing (Document 615-3, filed 02/24/22) containing a printout of a Daily Mail article from January 26, 2022. It features a photograph of a juror named 'Scotty' who served on the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The caption highlights that Scotty began the trial believing in Maxwell's presumption of innocence and viewing victims skeptically before the evidence convinced him otherwise.

This document appears to be a court exhibit containing excerpts from media interviews (MailOnline, The Independent) with a juror named 'David' following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury was swayed by the 'pattern' of grooming established by multiple accusers (Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Carolyn), despite the defense's attempts to challenge memories via expert Loftus. He specifically notes that while accuser Kate's testimony could not be used for charges due to UK laws, it was crucial for establishing the grooming methodology.

This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.