Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
An attorney makes a legal argument to a judge, clarifying that a specific conspiracy charge is based solely on a violation of New York law related to a single victim, Jane, and distinguishing this from conduct in Florida involving Carolyn and the testimony of witnesses Kate and Annie.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed speaker (attorney) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Your Honor (Judge) | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00016935.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney argues that a specific conspiracy charge is narrowly focused on a violation of New York law, with Jane as the sole victim. The attorney distinguishes this from separate conduct in Florida involving a person named Carolyn and clarifies that while witnesses Kate and Annie provided testimony, they are not victims under this particular charge.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A court hearing where an attorney is making an argument to a judge.
Date unknown
A court proceeding where the speaker, a convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein, makes a statement to the judge.
2023-06-29 • Courtroom
A court hearing where a defense attorney is making arguments, likely regarding bail.
2021-04-01 • Courtroom (unspecified)
Discussion regarding the schedule for jury deliberation in a trial, specifically concerning whether jurors should deliberate through the weekend and New Year's. The discussion is influenced by a spike in COVID-19 omicron variant cases in New York City, which poses a risk to trial completion.
2022-08-10 • Implied to be a court in New York City
A court hearing where the government argued for the pretrial detention of the defendant.
2019-07-16 • Court
A prosecutor is arguing against granting bail to a defendant, citing concerns about her financial disclosures and flight risk.
Date unknown • court
An attorney is arguing in a bail hearing, challenging the relevance of evidence presented by the government and outlining the legal standard for pretrial release under statute 3142.
2020-12-10 • court
An attorney presents a legal argument distinguishing an Ex Post Facto issue from a Sixth Amendment Apprendi issue, arguing a specific decision should be made by the jury.
2022-07-22 • Court in the Southern District
An attorney presents an argument to a judge that there is insufficient evidence to establish enticement related to arranging travel.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A court hearing regarding a defendant's right to possess a firearm during the pretrial phase of case 1:19-cr-00830-AT.
2019-12-19 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event