Event Details
March 26, 2021
Description
Internal USANYS correspondence regarding issuing a subpoena.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| USANYS Prosecutors | person | 0 | View Entity |
| AUDREY STRAUSS | person | 476 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00027728.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 among US Attorneys (SDNY). The prosecution team investigating Ghislaine Maxwell requests approval from US Attorney Audrey Strauss to issue a 'friendly subpoena' to an attorney who possesses a 2009 settlement agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and a victim. The attorney is willing to provide the document but requires a subpoena to do so; prosecutors deem the settlement relevant to proving Maxwell's participation in the abuse of underage girls.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Jury selection/instruction preparation for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
2021-09-25 • New York, NY
Submission of a legal document arguing for the denial of a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion.
2020-12-16 • New York, New York
Filing of a Certificate of Compliance for a motion/opposition in Case 20-3061, certifying it contains 5,099 words and adheres to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2020-09-16 • Southern District of New York
Document 100 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-12-18
The conclusion of a legal motion arguing for the denial of a Renewed Bail Motion was dated.
2020-12-16 • New York, New York
The deponent is questioned about their awareness of Mr. Epstein's sexual activities with others and whether they gave massages to Mr. Epstein or [Minor Victim-2].
Date unknown
The Government filed a document opposing the defendant's motion concerning a protective order.
2020-07-28 • Southern District of New York
The U.S. Government filed a document (Document 47) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-08-21 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Document 41 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-08-13 • Southern District of New York
Submission of legal conclusion affirming the denial of Maxwell's motion
2020-10-02 • New York, New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event