Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

Discussion of the legal doctrine of 'inferred bias' in the context of jury selection and dismissal for cause.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
juror person 81 View Entity
Trial Judge person 11 View Entity
district court organization 595 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009829.jpg

legal document • 699 KB
View

This legal document, a page from a court filing dated March 11, 2022, discusses the legal standard for dismissing a juror based on "inferred bias." It cites several precedents, including *Torres*, *Greer*, and *Ploof*, to establish that such a dismissal is at the discretion of the trial court and requires a high standard of proof, typically developed during voir dire. The text argues that the court would not have struck Juror 50 for inferred bias based on a hypothetical disclosure of sexual abuse, and distinguishes the defendant's reliance on the *Torres* case, where a juror was struck for cause due to involvement in structuring cash deposits.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.

Date unknown

View

Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.

2020-09-02 • SDNY

View

Court Recess due to Juror Illness

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

District court's opinion in the CVRA litigation

2019-01-01

View

Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

District court issued an opinion concluding that the government violated the CVRA by failing to consult with victims before entering the NPA.

2019-02-21

View

The District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell was issued.

2022-06-29 • District Court

View

The District Court denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.

Date unknown • District Court

View

A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.

Date unknown • District Court

View

The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony.

Date unknown • District Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal proceeding
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:42

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009829.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event