Event Details
Historical Event
Description
Judicial screening of Deep Throat
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assistant D.A.s | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Court personnel and stenographers | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Judge Alberti | person | 4 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017201.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of 'Deep Throat', Harvard's Quincy House, and the legal defense style, though his name is not explicitly in the text) included in House Oversight files. It details a court hearing where a Judge Alberti viewed the film 'Deep Throat' to determine if it was obscene under Massachusetts law, ultimately deciding it was 'trash' but not legally obscene. The narrative concludes with the author addressing protesters and students at Quincy House regarding free speech rights.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A civil litigation in which Maxwell produced documents that were shared with various parties under a protective order.
Date unknown
The document discusses the health and safety of participants in an ongoing court proceeding due to COVID-19.
Date unknown
Court hearing regarding United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB), likely the hearing allowing victims to speak following his death.
2019-09-03 • Southern District of New York Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event