January 25, 2021
Document 124 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00002313.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing (Document 124) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists four legal cases and one federal rule of criminal procedure as legal precedent for arguments made within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1962 to 2019 and involve various individuals in legal proceedings against the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00002312.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically Document 124 in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It outlines the structure of the parent document, listing sections such as Introduction, Argument, and Conclusion with their corresponding page numbers. The page is marked with a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating its origin or handling within that agency.
DOJ-OGR-00002315(1).jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing that the indictment against Ms. Maxwell is insufficient for her to prepare a defense. The filing claims the indictment uses vague, open-ended time periods for the alleged crimes (e.g., 'from at least in or about 1994') and fails to specifically identify the accusers, referring to them with general terms like 'minor girls' and 'victims'. This vagueness, the document argues, makes it impossible to apply the statute of limitations or know who the government considers a victim.
DOJ-OGR-00002312(1).jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically Document 124 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It outlines the structure of the parent document, which includes sections for introduction, argument, conclusion, and a certificate of service. A Bates number at the bottom (DOJ-OGR-00002312) suggests it is part of a production from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002313(1).jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents including Hamling v. United States, Russell v. United States, United States v. Jain, and United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, as well as Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c)(1). The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002313.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event