Date Unknown
An alternative argument is made for the Court to exercise mandamus jurisdiction to direct the district court to modify a protective order.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | person | 1982 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00019603.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing for the ability to share sealed information with Judge Preska to litigate the "Martindell issue," which she claims the government improperly handled. As an alternative, the filing requests that the appellate court exercise mandamus jurisdiction to compel the district court to modify a protective order, citing legal precedent to support both arguments.
Events with shared participants
Ms. Maxwell has been incarcerated for 225 days in de facto solitary confinement, monitored 24 hours a day by guards with a handheld camera.
2021-02-16 • MDC
Ms. Maxwell is being forced to prepare for trial with a computer that cannot do research or search documents, which is argued to be an inconceivable condition for preparation.
Date unknown • prison/jail
Ms. Maxwell sent a detailed letter requesting the production of discovery materials.
2020-10-13
Indictment of Ms. Maxwell.
2020-01-01 • New York
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
2020-07-02 • New Hampshire
Ms. Maxwell moved to stay discovery in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke' (No. 19-cv-10475) due to a pending criminal investigation.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
An appeal challenging a protective order's bar on disclosure of information.
Date unknown
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
Case 22-1426, Document 87, filed on 07/27/2023.
Date unknown
Ms. Maxwell and John talked about the importance of details regarding the household tasks.
2001-05-18
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event