Event Details
March 29, 2021
Description
Filing of Document 187 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDREY STRAUSS | person | 476 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00020758.jpg
This document is page 23 of 24 from a legal filing (Document 187) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 29, 2021. It details the 'Substitute Asset Provision,' outlining the government's intent to seize alternative property from the defendant if the original proceeds of the alleged crimes (specifically Count Six) cannot be located, have been transferred, or diminished in value. The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and United States Attorney Audrey Strauss.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Submission of a legal document arguing for the denial of a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion.
2020-12-16 • New York, New York
Filing of a Certificate of Compliance for a motion/opposition in Case 20-3061, certifying it contains 5,099 words and adheres to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2020-09-16 • Southern District of New York
Document 100 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-12-18
The conclusion of a legal motion arguing for the denial of a Renewed Bail Motion was dated.
2020-12-16 • New York, New York
The deponent is questioned about their awareness of Mr. Epstein's sexual activities with others and whether they gave massages to Mr. Epstein or [Minor Victim-2].
Date unknown
The Government filed a document opposing the defendant's motion concerning a protective order.
2020-07-28 • Southern District of New York
The U.S. Government filed a document (Document 47) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-08-21 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Document 41 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
2020-08-13 • Southern District of New York
Submission of legal conclusion affirming the denial of Maxwell's motion
2020-10-02 • New York, New York
The U.S. Attorney's office submitted the conclusion of a legal motion arguing that the court should deny the defendant's supplemental pre-trial motions for immediate disclosure of impeachment material concerning Minor Victim-4.
2021-05-21 • New York, New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event